The following is a real world example of when a counterfeit RECOM product was used within an application.
A renowned German mechanical engineering company developed a machine that required a controller board. During development, high-quality DC/DC converters with 24VDC inputs and 3.3V outputs were tested, and a RECOM DC/DC module was chosen. The machine, successfully manufactured and sold, quickly enjoyed phenomenal success. However, due to increased demand, the company needed more RECOM DC/DC converters than were available through
trusted RECOM distributor.
In their search for alternate suppliers, they found a company in Asia offering the exact RECOM component they needed. This Asian company had plenty in stock and sold it at a lower price than their regular distributor. What luck! The German company ordered 500 converters, unaware of the counterfeit converters risk.
As these converters were installed and machines operated, initial complaints emerged. Service technicians had to exchange controller boards that quit service. It became clear: the error was almost always one of the counterfeit converters on the board, disrupting the entire control unit. The financial and legal risk included immense costs for support in the USA, China, and Europe, as well as consumer claims for production losses. The brand-new product suffered painful image damage.
We also had our reputation on the line. The question arose: Could a long-used converter cause a production error despite regular checks? Before the first defective converter return, HALT tests conducted in our own environmental laboratory in Gmunden on current production specimens showed no deviations. When broken parts arrived, the surprise was immense. Despite a correct RECOM logo and type designation, they appeared different, with a vertically stretched and printed logo rather than a lasered one. A bold fake!
The photo shows the original vs counterfeit RECOM REC5-243.3SRW; original on the left, counterfeit on the right. While the external differences were subtle, internally the components differed significantly. A review in the Environmental Laboratory showed the counterfeit could not obtain UL approval or meet RoHS regulations.
Internal examination revealed quality differences. On the left, the original RECOM converter with well-isolated E-core; on the right, the fake with poorly designed insulation that fell short of requirements. A component worth a few euros led to costly machine failures and service costs in a significant five-digit range—not counting the loss in reputation as a reliable manufacturer for the German company.